Mind Lob - A Christian Conservative Perspective

This week I share with you what happened to me last week relating to a woman that needed help. From there I transition into what I've experienced regarding the education of the Holy Spirit. I follow up at the end with a little about the Mud Flood theory. Support the show

Let's talk about the second coming of Christ. I know, the Bible says we don't know, right? Are we being lazy? What did Christ do historically when people weren't prepared? Support the show

In today's podcast a wealth of topics are covered in an hour. So buckle up, hang on, and watch for the curves. Support the show

This week, we walk through who should preach, and whether could it be true that aliens are demonic entities. And what about anesthesia along with a look into my health journey? These topics culminate in an exploration of the world in which we live and does trusting our senses convey a theological trust? The information included in this podcast is for information purposes only. No material provided is intended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek a qualified medical care provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical. Condition or treatment before going on a new health care regimen, and never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have heard on this podcast. Support the show

During a trip I took last week, we had a discussion about End Time events. This discussion is a kitchen sink discussion, where I share thoughts about aliens, genetics, where we are in the prophetic timeline and much more. Support the show

This episode is a bit of a free discussion. It's more conversational trying to unite a few concepts over the past few episodes in a thought experiment. Support the show

The definitions of words are fundamental to understanding meaning. As we transition from an understanding of our own bias and the prisons encountered that are designed to steal our time, we explore this idea of language. In the end, we are left with a powerful tool to identify which worldview is the correct worldview. Support the show

Agendas surround us, and time reveals how foolish our choices can be if we follow the wrong people or ideas. This podcast is a critical step to understanding time and more about the human condition. As always, these are thought experiments and not dogmatic statements of truth. Support the show

In this episode, we discuss the discrimination of one advertiser, then answer a question about women in ministry, followed by the next step in freeing yourself from the anchors of self-delusion and putting on the glasses of consideration, while freeing yourself from myopic illusions. As always, thank you for listening, and please share MindLob. It's a great encouragement to our efforts. Support the show

Trying to align with the truth is more challenging than ever. Join Ken as he explores how one may be able to escape the gravity of colliding worldviews to reach a better understanding of transcendence. Support the show

I have spent the last month studying COVID and here are my thoughts. Support the show

The battle for reality lives between not in answers, but in the trenches between the question and the answer. Support the show

Support the show

Support the show

Support the show

I wanted to expand on the last podcast this week and ask the question, "Could materialistic evolution use religion as a beneficial component if it is true?" I mentioned this in one paragraph last week but I felt it needed elaboration. My point is not that religions are a beneficial result of materialism, but could it be argued that religion could be used as such if it were true? If so, then what does this say about materialists that argue religion is an ancient construct that the detrimental to humanity? In contrast, could it be argued that religion is a viable ingredient for materialism? If so, could this actually mean those incapable of accepting the idea of God and objective morality as actually evolutionary inferior and an impediment to humanity? Share your thoughts on this brainstorm and subscribe to our podcast at https://mindlob.com. Support the show

A quick update on COVID and then I dive into some writings I started years ago. These writings were the underpinning of Mindlob.com. Below is a transcript from the book in part... Consider two simple terms: “good” and “evil”. When you think of good, you probably think of helping an old lady across the street, solving world hunger, or saving someone from personal harm or abuse. While when thinking of evil, we think of running down the old lady with a car, starving people, or causing emotional harm or abuse. Pretty easy, right? Only a madman couldn’t discern concepts like hate, love, compassion, rape, altruism, lie, and truth. What’s great is that we all intuitively agree that good and evil are relatively universal concepts for humanity. Consider atheist-based campaigns that rightfully advertise the paraphrased message, “you don’t need God to be good”. I love these campaigns because they let us know that all worldviews intuitively understand that “good” is universally acknowledged and understood regardless of your theistic or atheistic persuasion. Some atheists would agree that good and evil are constructs created as a by-product of human evolution. Somehow these “goods” and “bads” were classified to give humanity a better chance of survival. Ultimately, however, the only difference between something being labeled as good or bad is based upon our primitive ancestors assigning arbitrary concepts to either the “bad” or “good” category. And if primitives looking to survive guided these ancient views of good and evil over generations are those categorizations still relevant today? Sure thousands of years ago, murder would be a problem. With the materialistic view, having groups of mammals living together would have given an enormous strategic advantage for survival, but with humankind now being the apex predator and passing seven billion, is it still logical to sanctify each life? Could it be argued that a mass genocide of the weak and inferior is best for the survival of humanity as a whole? Consider Darwin’s thoughts in “The Descent of Man”: “With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilised men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to smallpox. Thus the weak members of civilised societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly anyone is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed. The aid we feel impelled to give to the helpless is mainly an incidental result of the instinct of sympathy, which .... Support the show

In this podcast, we share a few emails we received regarding COVID-19 and explore philosophical oppression. Make sure to become a Mindlobber and get some links related to this podcast. Support the show

Welcome back. I am still looking for evidence about COVID Protocols and share a personal story on why I don't trust authority without evidence. Support the show

This podcast episode has ran for over a week and no one is able to provide me with science data relating to COVID. If you have it, please provide me with information. I am not interested in anecdotal information: I want objective scientific data that is peer reviewed and validated. Support the show